Thursday, December 8, 2011
A violin on the Metro at rush hour
Tuesday, November 22, 2011
Joel's Murals
Ask most people who were in DC today and they'll tell you it was a dreary, gray day. Not so for the lucky three of us who spent the day touring murals that burst with color despite the weather.
Wednesday, November 16, 2011
The doctor's office and the name of this blog
Friday, November 4, 2011
Virginia’s off-off-year (and extremely important) election
Will Virginia be the next Alabama when it comes to immigration policy?
That question hangs in the balance ahead of Tuesday’s “off-off-year” election in the state I call home. One party’s slim majority in the state Senate is the only barrier keeping us from severe measures like those adopted in Alabama—and Georgia and Arizona before it.
The problems these laws are causing go way beyond those Stephen Colbert highlighted in a mostly brilliant segment last week. Even the Wall Street Journal editorial page, which is not known for its liberal bent, highlighted labor shortages and other economic problems such laws cause.
Think it couldn’t happen in Virginia? I’d rather not take the chance. Claire Guthrie GastaƱaga, a lobbyist and political consultant with thorough knowledge of Virginia politics, has written an immigration-policy outlook for the 2012 Virginia General Assembly session. First, she points out that Virginia has almost 50 laws on the books that directly affect immigrants, most of which “are restrictions on the rights or benefits of ‘aliens’ or immigrants, including the rights and benefits of persons lawfully present in the United States.”
She goes on to forecast 25 bills likely to be introduced in 2012, listed under law enforcement, business and employment, social and medical services, education, and housing. All but two would have a negative impact on our neighbors who are immigrants.
Voter turnout tends to be low when we’re not voting for president, lower still with no congressional seats up. This off-off-year we’re not even voting for governor—maybe we should add another “off.”
But make no mistake: This election is big. I care about living in a state that lets its children go to school without fear, that doesn’t want to encourage racial profiling by police and underreporting of crimes to police, that recognizes the economic contributions of all of its residents. Those who agree should approach this election with the same fervor we have when we’re electing a president.
What kind of state do we want to live in? On Tuesday, we have an outstanding opportunity to answer that question.
Tuesday, November 1, 2011
A great Halloween
At the last minute, I came up with a way to join them. Two weeks earlier, the Loma Prieta earthquake had struck San Francisco. On Halloween, instead of trick-or-treating for candy, I asked for donations to the Red Cross to help earthquake victims.
Other than a $10 bill from a friend’s mom, the endeavor was unsuccessful. People wanted to give all of us a Halloween-size Snickers and be done with us; they did not want to reach into their wallets.
This year’s Halloween reminded me of that one—except that last night was a huge success.
Liz and I had received an invitation from our friend Jessica: “Join me for grown-up trick-or-treating! Wear a costume, have a drink, and go door-to-door collecting canned goods for Martha's Table, a food bank in Columbia Heights.” Jess has been collecting canned goods on Halloween for nearly 10 years. She is not closely connected with Martha's Table, though she does receive a note from them every year, in which they address her as a Mr. named Jesse.
We put on our ninja costumes and met up at Jessica’s house in DC’s Mount Pleasant neighborhood. Before trick-or-treating, we checked out the amazing block party around the corner on Lamont Street. (Best costume on an adult: a very well-done zombie holding a handmade “I WAS THE 99%” sign.)
Then we grabbed our backpacks and canvas bags and split into pairs to traverse different parts of the neighborhood, taking care not to hit the same house twice. We got a handful of looks that said, "Aren't you a little old to be trick-or-treating?"
But after we explained that we were trick-or-treating for Martha's Table, people’s generosity was inspiring. We expected them to give a can or two; at some houses, younger trick-or-treaters had to wait a minute while residents fetched four or six items—or, a couple of times, a plastic bag full.
When our backpacks and bags got too heavy, we had to make an unplanned drop-off at Jessica’s house before heading out again. At the end of the night, friends built towers of nonperishables on her coffee table. (The one pictured at left was followed by an additional one at least twice its size. And no, I'm not sure what the food bank will do with oysters, but most of the donations will be quite useful.)
We're sorry only that we heard, but didn't see, the annual Mount Pleasant rite of re-creating Michael Jackson's "Thriller" dance.
Thursday, October 27, 2011
Welcome!
It’s the fourth Thursday of the month, the time my monthly column in the Washington Jewish Week should be appearing. For 26 months, I wrote about 700 words, hoped the newspaper wouldn’t introduce grammatical errors into them, sent the finished product to family and friends, and got paid enough to buy a tank of gas, with a little left over.
If you are a reader of my columns, thank you—and I’m sorry to report that they are no more. The feature to which I contributed, “Capital Schmoozing,” didn’t survive the Jewish Week’s redesign this month. (Now I can say it: “Capital Schmoozing”? Ugh. I would have changed the name, even if I would not have done away with the feature.)
That’s just one of the inspirations for starting this blog, where more than once a month (I hope), I’ll write fewer than 700 words (usually). I’ll be responsible for my own darn grammatical errors, and I’ll hope that family and friends (and maybe even a few friends I haven’t met yet) will read or keep reading. You don’t even have to pay me! (I try not to drive much anyway.) I can even include links now—no extra charge.
The name stems from my journalism background: I've always tried to conclude an interview by asking, “What have I not asked about that’s important to the story?” It’s a good question to ask, in many more contexts than journalism.
So, what will I write about? My sister asked me that today, and I replied: “Anything and everything ... Saving the world, immigration reform, politics, activism/social change, language/grammar/editing/writing, being Jewish, weather, sports, music, frustrations, elations.” To which I should quickly add humor/goofiness.
For starters.
It’s both exciting and a bit daunting to have a vastly wider audience. Thanks for reading—and please let me know if I've missed something that's important to the story.